Archive for January, 2008

Wine Industry Professionals

Tuesday, January 15th, 2008

It is after 3AM and I have not slept much since getting to Israel 5 days ago. I do not want too many days to go by without blogging, so while thinking about what to write tonight I thought about the people I have been meeting with on my trip – mostly Israeli winemakers. Now Israelis can be tough people, but for the most part I LOVE the people I have met who work in the trade here. The same can be said about those what worked in the trade while I was working in Napa. Generalizations are just that, general statements that are never 100% true, but for the most part the people that choose to get into the Wine Industry seem to be people who generally love wine and get into the business so that they can love what they do. Which leads to happier, warmer and overall more likable people.

What of the WINE SNOBS or KNOW IT ALLS??? – they are out there. I have visited and been to many wine bars where I was so turned off by the people that worked there that I vowed never to go back again. And truth be told there are wineries and winemakers in both California and Israel whom I met and did not like one bit.  Sure that is life, not everybody gets along, but it has been my experience that people who share a common bond (such as wine) have an easier time hitting it off.

Sorry for the barely wine related post. Just what was on my half asleep mind at the moment.

Happy Monday and L’Chaim from ISRAEL!!!

WTG

Going GREEN with your wine drinking

Friday, January 11th, 2008

I arrived in Israel a little more than 36 hours ago and I’ve already begun to run around the country to meet with my wonderful friends in the wine business out here. I’ll be heading into the Judean Hills region today but I wanted to put together a real quick post before leaving.

A recently really an interesting piece written by Dr Vino (drvino.com) AKA Tyler Colman that I found in the NYT published on Dec 30, 2007 called Red, White or Green?

In the article Colman discusses the “carbon footprint” of a bottle of wine or as he explains it the “amount of carbon dioxide (that) is emitted in its production and transportation”. While I will not get into the politics or personal preference for saving the environment, I do want to quote some interesting facts Colman points out.

  • A Napa Valley wine can emit 2.6 pounds of carbon dioxide on its journey from growing the grapes, making the wine and transport to San Francisco
  • The same bottle making the truck trip to Connecticut (or elsewhere on the east coast, say New York City) would emit 5.7 pounds of carbon dioxide in total.
  • Holding the growing method, winery practices and bottle size constant, it is more carbon-efficient for people in Connecticut to drink a bottle of wine from Bordeaux than from Sonoma. The short truck route on both ends of the efficient miles of container shipping means the French wine has 50 percent less carbon dioxide emissions, about three pounds.

Now, the French and many of their European counterparts are selling us wine at exorbitant prices already, and the weakening dollar is making those already expensive bottles even MORE expensive.

SO, we should not be buying wine from California because of carbon emissions, we can’t afford to be buying French and other European wines (let along wait for them to be mature, or ready to be drunk), so where does that leave us???

GOOD QUESTION! I think this is where the concept of drinking wines from lesser known winemaking regions comes into play. And I bet you know where I’m going now….yup, DRINK ISRAELI WINE!!!! Most israeli wines are made in a New World Style so you don’t have to lay them down and wait 10+ years to soften and be ready to drink. And Israeli wines are more carbon friendly than our own domestic Napa wines – at least for those of us residing on the East Coast.

Remember, drink Israeli wine!!!

Have a fabulous weekend.

WTG.

Laurie Daniel: What’s ahead for wine drinkers in 2008

Tuesday, January 8th, 2008

A recent article, “What’s ahead for wine drinkers in 2008”, written by Laurie Daniel for the San jose Mercury News is an interesting read, with 4 predictions listed below.  Not much for me to add but I do want to comment on #3.

1.  Domestic wines should look more attractive as prices rise on many imports.

2. More companies will start touting how “green” their wines are.

3. We’ll see more wines from ever-more obscure places.

4. Some wine producers will become more transparent about their winemaking practices.

 

 

When referring to the “obscure places” in #3 Daniels mentions places in Countries like Italy & Spain that once was not considered to be a wine producing region and now is.  She proceeds to mention countries such as Croatia, Bulgaria, the former Soviet republic of Georgia and even goes so far as to contemplate the possibility of wines from China.

 

I am interested in this prediction (isn’t it really an already proven trend?) as it relates to another “obscure” region…yup, ISRAEL!  While Israel can not even be mentioned in the same breath in terms of size, I think the recent Wine Advocate feature on Israeli wines both confirms Daniels suspicion that new, previously unexpected wine regions will emerge in the not too distant future AND that Israel should be included in the list of “obscure places”.

 

Keep your eyes open…premium Israeli wine MAY be coming to a shelf near you sooner than you think…

 

Happy happy everybody…

WTG.

Italian Wine tasting (Sicily) & Pizza

Monday, January 7th, 2008

I just got back from a fabulous impromptu Italian wine & pizza tasting with several of my wine tasting group members (and some guests/possible new members??).

There were only 7 of us there, and 5 of the 7 can be considered “industry” people (the other two are “public defenders”). The fact that there were so many industry people should not intimidate anyone as we all CLAIM to know a thing or two about wine, but in reality we are just a bunch of open-mined AND opinionated (is that possible?) wine lovers who have sacrificed a good livelihood for one we infatuate over.

There are so many things I can write about. The heated argument about whether JOE consumer cares about HOW his wine is made. Which is better, New World wines or OLD WORLD wines. How to interact with those who know less about wine. The evening prompted so many interesting topics yet I must admit…I am too BUZZED to get deep right now. So I’m simply going to blog (briefly) about “TECHNOLOGY”.

We talked about the improvements wines from all over the world have made in recent years.  Someone commented how they wonder if wines from the same winery in a recent vintage & one from a vintage many years ago were made (and tasted) the same (or at least comparably). At which point the phenomena of technology & perceived “better quality” came up. We wondered if improved technology has in fact improved quality or has led many AUTHENTIC & genuinely hand made wines to have now become more generic – also unaffectionately known as “laboratory wines”.

Overall, I liked 3 of the 7 wines we had. I felt the other 4 were overly extracted and lacked balance. They were too jammy (or as our gracious host put it possessed – “stewed plums”) & did not have the acidic & tannic backbone to hold up to the sweet/extracted/jammy flavors. The 3 I liked were not the types of wine I typically go for. They were not Bordeaux style wines. No Cabernet Sauvignion. No Merlot. No Cab Franc, Petit Verdot or even any Syrah (shiraz). Lots of varietals I am not all that familiar with. But the ones I liked had interesting yet subtle fruit, nice minerality, a hint of spice or floral to the nose. But most important was a backbone that sufficiently supported the flavors.

I’m off to Israel this week to meet with my fabulous boutique wine producing contacts and help to bring back NY/US worthy wines.  Barring unforeseen wine drinking within the next 48 hours my next report comes from the holy land AKA the next “up-and-coming wine haven”…

Until then, happy wine tasting…

WTG.

Wine Tasting Groups

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

I just read a great article on wine tasting groups. Upon my return from Napa in February of ’06 I joined one such group in NYC that I am thrilled to be able to say I am still a vibrant member of. At our group’s core is a non-conformist, part-time wine clerk, & budding writer, whom together with his attorney finance have graciously hosted several of our bi-monthly events. While there a few wine industry people (all relatively new to the industry) in the group, mainly it is a warm, wine-loving, eclectic group of doctors, lawyers, researchers, professionals of all types, & aspiring wine aficionados who enjoy wine & one another’s company. Twice a month may be a lot for some, but for those seeking a way to learn about wine, or even simply a new social outlet, it is a great time. I am also happy to report that following many of these intimate drinking escapades I now feel a special bond with most of the “regulars”.

While living in the city and fully utilizing public transportation affords me the luxury of not adhering to Mr. Gregutt’s “Dump Bucket” mandate, without further ado, here is the article, written by Paul Greggutt (found online at the Seattle Times website)

January 2, 2008 – Resolved for 2008: Start a wine-tasting group

Special to the Seattle Times

Let’s start the new year right, with a resolution to be proactive about wine-tasting in 2008.

Let’s face it, most wine encounters are random. You grab a bottle while shopping for dinner, or you pick something off a restaurant list because the sommelier recommends it. Maybe you are visiting friends and they pull something out of the cellar for you to try.

There is nothing wrong with any of that. But if you want to make 2008 the year that you really make some headway understanding wine, you should resolve right now to start a tasting group.

There’s a big difference between drinking wine and tasting wine in a (more or less) formal group setting. Drinking is for fun, for dinner parties, for nights on the town, with wine in a supporting role. Tasting is a different sort of social occasion, where wine is the star of the show, and attention is focused upon each bottle.

I am fortunate to be a member in two, long-running tasting groups. Both meet monthly, and taste the wines blind (meaning the bottles are concealed). Here’s how it works: A topic is chosen some time in advance — generally a specific type of wine from a specific region — and that becomes the focus for the tasting.

In one group, a volunteer gathers the wines. The total cost is then divided among the 12 members. This system works well in several ways. First, it guarantees that a diverse representation of appropriate wines will be poured. Second, it ensures that only one person in the group knows what any of the wines are. However, this system only works if everyone shows up and divides the cost fairly.

If you want a more ad hoc approach, have the host assign the topic and let each tasting-group member bring a bottle. That way, if a few last-minute cancellations occur, no one is on the hook for the money.

A tasting group of 8 to 12 people is just the right number; big enough for a lively discussion, but small enough to allow for generous pours. In one of my groups, each person sets out a dozen glasses and the wines are all poured at once, from numbered brown paper bags. This offers the advantage of allowing the most direct comparisons among the entire group, because there is no specific tasting sequence required, and all wines are present at all times.

In my other group, each person has just one glass, and the wines are tasted one at a time. We keep the pours small (1 ounce per person) so each bottle can go around twice. This also works well; the first time through, the tasters can get a good conversation going with a lot of guessing about such topics as the producer, the vintage and so on.

The second time around the wine has had time to breathe, and impressions are likely to change. You’ll see that most wines are moving targets. Flavors expand, contract, harden, soften or morph into something entirely unforeseen when the bottle is first opened. Wines that at first seemed delicious sometimes quickly fall apart; wines that may have been hard and tight open up and reveal layers of flavor that were missed the first time through.

Why taste blind? The simple answer is you learn more. It adds to the excitement and fuels the conversation. And when tasting blind, it is the prerogative of the host to provide a ringer — one wine (hidden among the rest) that is not from the assigned topic.

If, for example, your topic is Washington syrah, then the ringer might be a syrah from Paso Robles. Part of the fun is trying to spot the ringer.

You may not be quite ready to sign on to a monthly commitment, but winter is a good time to host a preview wine-tasting event, to see who among your friends might be interested in joining a regular group. The setup is simple. Have a clean wine glass for each person, along with dump buckets, a notepad and pen, and some light snacks.

Once the wines are gathered, someone will need to pull the corks, wrap each bottle in a plain brown bag, seal it with a rubber band, and number it. Hide the corks so no one can cheat! This is a blind tasting, remember.

Now about those dump buckets. “We’re not going to spit good wine!” your friends may complain. Oh yes they will. That’s the serious part of a formal tasting. How else can you sample a dozen wines responsibly? As host, you will have to enforce that rule. For what it’s worth, in my two groups, which are mostly composed of winemakers, wine distributors and wine retailers, everyone spits everything all the time. That is how it is done in the trade.

At the end of the night, have the members vote for their favorite — preferably before the bags are pulled and the wines’ identities revealed. In any group of a dozen wines you’ll discover a couple of gems that you’ll want to purchase. There are usually a couple of disappointments — pricey and/or prestigious wines that simply didn’t rise to the occasion. But for the price of a single bottle, you’ve tasted up to a dozen, and found the one(s) you like the best. Happy tasting!

Paul Gregutt is the author of “Washington Wines and Wineries The Essential Guide.”

 

Wine making: technical aspects – Do You Care?

Wednesday, January 2nd, 2008

There are several thing that led to my career shift into the wine industry. But the bottom line is I really love EVERYTHING about it. The vineyards, the harvests, the hard work, the winemaking, the aging, all the technical aspects, etc…

BUT, that is me. I have been told by friends that if/when they hear someone ask me a wine related question they run for the hills. Because wine (and wine making) is SO INVOLVED I tend to stumble into long winded responses that can put people to sleep.

That said, I was recently asked by a friend at an Israeli winery to help them out with an English version of their “technical spec sheet” – something they have been told by their importer is very important in the marketing of their wines. While I was thrilled to help out, I wondered, DOES THE AVERAGE WINE CONSUMER REALLY CARE ABOUT STUFF LIKE “ph”, “TA”, BRIX AT HARVEST, etc…?????????

More on this topic in future blog posts, but I welcome any thoughts…

Happy ’08!

WTG.