Archive for the ‘wine tasting’ Category

Wine Tasting Groups

Thursday, January 3rd, 2008

I just read a great article on wine tasting groups. Upon my return from Napa in February of ’06 I joined one such group in NYC that I am thrilled to be able to say I am still a vibrant member of. At our group’s core is a non-conformist, part-time wine clerk, & budding writer, whom together with his attorney finance have graciously hosted several of our bi-monthly events. While there a few wine industry people (all relatively new to the industry) in the group, mainly it is a warm, wine-loving, eclectic group of doctors, lawyers, researchers, professionals of all types, & aspiring wine aficionados who enjoy wine & one another’s company. Twice a month may be a lot for some, but for those seeking a way to learn about wine, or even simply a new social outlet, it is a great time. I am also happy to report that following many of these intimate drinking escapades I now feel a special bond with most of the “regulars”.

While living in the city and fully utilizing public transportation affords me the luxury of not adhering to Mr. Gregutt’s “Dump Bucket” mandate, without further ado, here is the article, written by Paul Greggutt (found online at the Seattle Times website)

January 2, 2008 – Resolved for 2008: Start a wine-tasting group

Special to the Seattle Times

Let’s start the new year right, with a resolution to be proactive about wine-tasting in 2008.

Let’s face it, most wine encounters are random. You grab a bottle while shopping for dinner, or you pick something off a restaurant list because the sommelier recommends it. Maybe you are visiting friends and they pull something out of the cellar for you to try.

There is nothing wrong with any of that. But if you want to make 2008 the year that you really make some headway understanding wine, you should resolve right now to start a tasting group.

There’s a big difference between drinking wine and tasting wine in a (more or less) formal group setting. Drinking is for fun, for dinner parties, for nights on the town, with wine in a supporting role. Tasting is a different sort of social occasion, where wine is the star of the show, and attention is focused upon each bottle.

I am fortunate to be a member in two, long-running tasting groups. Both meet monthly, and taste the wines blind (meaning the bottles are concealed). Here’s how it works: A topic is chosen some time in advance — generally a specific type of wine from a specific region — and that becomes the focus for the tasting.

In one group, a volunteer gathers the wines. The total cost is then divided among the 12 members. This system works well in several ways. First, it guarantees that a diverse representation of appropriate wines will be poured. Second, it ensures that only one person in the group knows what any of the wines are. However, this system only works if everyone shows up and divides the cost fairly.

If you want a more ad hoc approach, have the host assign the topic and let each tasting-group member bring a bottle. That way, if a few last-minute cancellations occur, no one is on the hook for the money.

A tasting group of 8 to 12 people is just the right number; big enough for a lively discussion, but small enough to allow for generous pours. In one of my groups, each person sets out a dozen glasses and the wines are all poured at once, from numbered brown paper bags. This offers the advantage of allowing the most direct comparisons among the entire group, because there is no specific tasting sequence required, and all wines are present at all times.

In my other group, each person has just one glass, and the wines are tasted one at a time. We keep the pours small (1 ounce per person) so each bottle can go around twice. This also works well; the first time through, the tasters can get a good conversation going with a lot of guessing about such topics as the producer, the vintage and so on.

The second time around the wine has had time to breathe, and impressions are likely to change. You’ll see that most wines are moving targets. Flavors expand, contract, harden, soften or morph into something entirely unforeseen when the bottle is first opened. Wines that at first seemed delicious sometimes quickly fall apart; wines that may have been hard and tight open up and reveal layers of flavor that were missed the first time through.

Why taste blind? The simple answer is you learn more. It adds to the excitement and fuels the conversation. And when tasting blind, it is the prerogative of the host to provide a ringer — one wine (hidden among the rest) that is not from the assigned topic.

If, for example, your topic is Washington syrah, then the ringer might be a syrah from Paso Robles. Part of the fun is trying to spot the ringer.

You may not be quite ready to sign on to a monthly commitment, but winter is a good time to host a preview wine-tasting event, to see who among your friends might be interested in joining a regular group. The setup is simple. Have a clean wine glass for each person, along with dump buckets, a notepad and pen, and some light snacks.

Once the wines are gathered, someone will need to pull the corks, wrap each bottle in a plain brown bag, seal it with a rubber band, and number it. Hide the corks so no one can cheat! This is a blind tasting, remember.

Now about those dump buckets. “We’re not going to spit good wine!” your friends may complain. Oh yes they will. That’s the serious part of a formal tasting. How else can you sample a dozen wines responsibly? As host, you will have to enforce that rule. For what it’s worth, in my two groups, which are mostly composed of winemakers, wine distributors and wine retailers, everyone spits everything all the time. That is how it is done in the trade.

At the end of the night, have the members vote for their favorite — preferably before the bags are pulled and the wines’ identities revealed. In any group of a dozen wines you’ll discover a couple of gems that you’ll want to purchase. There are usually a couple of disappointments — pricey and/or prestigious wines that simply didn’t rise to the occasion. But for the price of a single bottle, you’ve tasted up to a dozen, and found the one(s) you like the best. Happy tasting!

Paul Gregutt is the author of “Washington Wines and Wineries The Essential Guide.”

 

Wine Glasses – does it REALLY matter which shape one uses???

Thursday, December 20th, 2007

I recently read a very interesting article on the topic. I believe the article was written by Mark Phillips and can be found http://www.winetasting.org/wineglass.html.

In a nutshell, Mr. Phillips cites his own experiments as well as those of the Monell Chemical Senses Center (“one of the world’s most prestigious laboratories studying taste and smell”) as written by Daniel Zwerdling, an NPR reporter in an article about Riedel, published in Gourmet Magazine in August 2004.

All experiments basically proved that “subjects couldn’t tell any difference from one glass to another”.

So what of these Reidel studies or tastings where people claim to appreciate certain wines much more from certain glasses?

That question is addressed by Mark as having 2 possible answers, both I believe are quite compelling and extend beyond wine glasses, to a lot of wine in general. His answers were:

1: great salesmanship
2: power of suggestion

A wine’s label, price tag, “expert” score – just some of the many factors that influence how people react to & appreciate wine.

As someone with a wide and eclectic taste in music, I have often compared wine appreciation to music appreciation. Most people can recognize whether music (or wine) is just plain BAD. But when it comes to all other MUSIC (wine) the beauty is in the eye of the beholder. One may like it while the other does not. One might insist it is the best they have even heard (tasted) while the other thinks it is absolute crap.  And BOTH are right.

Same thing with wine glasses. Yes – small, thick & poorly shaped glasses stink for wine tasting/drinking/appreciation. But once one gets to the larger, thin, quality crystal wine glasses, is there really that much of a difference? And who is to say which is “BETTER”??

As always, drink YOUR wine YOUR way from a glass YOU like & ENJOY!!!!

WTG.

Evolution of wine appreciation

Tuesday, December 18th, 2007

I have recently been realizing that my preferred wine style is evolving. Which has me thinking back to the evolution of my wine appreciation.

When I first began drinking wines, it was the sweet white stuff that did it for me. Funny how Europeans poke fun at Americans, indicating that Coca Cola and its thick sweet flavors have influenced our taste preferences to such an extent that all we like are sweet (or seemingly sweet) wines. (When i say seemingly sweet, it is because fruit forward wines are often interpreted by the brain as sweet wines.)

My first REAL appreciation of red wines (I think of it as my wine epiphany) happened at a steak house. I will never forget the moment, nor will I forget the wine. I was trading stocks at the time and a bunch of guys went out to celebrate a friends birthday. We all ordered our steaks, and one guy decided we should order a bottle of wine. Knowing that I would be chipping in for said bottle I poured myself a nice glass and gave it a shot. BAMMM. It was Hagafen Napa Merlot & my life would never be the same. People talk about remembering their “firsts”- I will never forget mine.

Anyway, back to the topic at hand. “Sweeter” & softer Merlots were what I initially preferred to the tannic & cloyingly dry Cabernets I had the opportunity to taste. Until somewhere along the line I grew tired of one-dimensional Merlots and began to appreciate Cabernets. For a while, it was Cab or nothing.

The next step in my “Wine appreciation evolution” was when I re-discovered whites. NO, not the sweet ones (although I had an amazing 23 year old Sauternes), but the dry, floral acidic ones. Wow, these guys complement food. It was not easy to admit it, but they actually complemented many of the foods I eat better than the Cabs I had developed a love affair with.

The most recent evolution I am starting to notice is a shift away from fruit bombs. Fear not, I am not becoming a Francophile. But I am shying away from some Australian Shiraz’s that seem to either have some residual sugar in them or were just SOO extracted (possibly by rotary fermenters) that there is nothing but fruit there. I like a little earth &/or minerality. These punch in the face fruit bomb wines were nice for a while. But I now need more.

I’m still learning and my palate is ever evolving. I bet YOURS is too. let me know…

Happy drinking!

WTG.

Châteauneuf-du-Pape – blind tasting & results

Friday, December 7th, 2007

I could list the 7 Châteauneuf-du-Pape’s that we tried and my corresponding tasting notes for each. But that would be boring. I’d rather make fun of myself and the group.

There were 10 of us in attendance last night, 7 women & 3 guys (gotta love the ratio). The wines we tried were from the ’04 & ’05 vintages. Included in the tasting was the Châteauneuf-du-Pape Rouge, Beaucastel ’04 – a $100 wine that is considered to be one of the best. And the Châteauneuf-du-Pape Rouge, Clos des Papes ’04, a $75 bottle and another stalwart.

We do our tastings blind and one of the things we typically find ourselves doing is trying to guess which is the “fancy” or expensive wine. Sure enough we unanimously chose a $35 bottle of Châteauneuf-du-Pape, Dom. Saint Prefert ’05 as our favorite.

The point of this post is simply that wine is something we all should have fun with. Don’t listen to critics, bloggers, sommeliers, or snobby know-it-all friends. Go to wine bars, wine shops, restaurants & try as much wine as you can. And when you find one you like, WRITE IT DOWN. To hell with what the critics tell you you should like. Do you listen to critics about what movies to like (ok, maybe) what music to listen to (OK, maybe), or what politician to vote for??? OK, so I guess critics do hold a prominent role in our society. And the bottom line is, these people gain the status of critic because they devote a TON of time to a specific topic and become (so-called) experts on that topic. But when it comes down to it, it is YOU who is buying the wine, YOU who is drinking the wine & YOU who needs to enjoy the wine.

Have fun – Drink wine. And don’t let anyone tell you what you SHOULD and SHOULD NOT like!!!!!
-WTG.

Wining and even some dining

Thursday, December 6th, 2007

Too “tired” from all the wine last night to blog. But I was out at a couple of important places and there is lots to write. So without further ado…

I was to have drinks with a gentleman who was interested in being involved with the Israel Wine project I am working on. Given that the project involves wine from a specific region, we decided to check out a wine bar in NYC that has wines (and food style) exclusively from a non-traditional wine region – South Africa. In a nutshell, this large wine bar has done so much right, but seems to be missing “it”.

Upon arriving at the bar the place was quite crowded – but what wine bars aren’t these days. It took several minutes for someone to even acknowledge our presence, and once that was done, it took several more minutes before we were assured we would be seated shortly.

Once we were (finally) seated, we quickly picked out two S. African wines that had a little age to them. MISTAKE. Now I know, I must do a better job documenting the exact wines, but I do remember that we ordered a 2000 Merlot & a 2001 Cabernet. The merlot was either oxidized, past its prime (yet still tannic?), blended with Pinotage (I’m not a fan), or full of Brett (brettanomyces). The Cab seemed better, but it was the type of wine where the nose did not carry over to the palate. It had an unusual candied/sour cherry & cherry wood nose while the palate was more dark fruit and oak driven. Better than the merlot, but not great.

Now I must admit, there is 1 thing I love about this wine bar. Upon receiving your wine, customers get an empty glass & a small carafe of the wine they ordered. This allows the drinker(s) to pour as much or as little as they want at a time. It also makes sharing easier.

After the wine bar we were off to Capsouto Freres in Tribeca. CF is known for their wines, and it just so happens that there was an article in yesterdays NY Sun about Jacques, the proprietor, and his ambassador-ship for Israeli wines in particular ( http://www.nysun.com/article/67518 ).

Upon arriving at CF we informed Jacques that we read the article in the paper and I reminded him that we had previously met. I think he was pleased that we had seen the piece and he graciously engaged us in conversation about Israeli wine. Not only does Jacques have a fine palate, but he is a shrewd businessman. He selects fine wines for his wine list, but also seeks out deals and is consequently able to offer wines at very fair prices.

At Jacques’ recommendation we selected the 2001 Yatir blend – made from 60% Cab & 40% Merlot. This wine was made from fruit from the Judean Hills region & 2001 was (I believe) the first vintage released by Yatir. Sadly the wine was not overly impressive. While it was better than the South African wines we had earlier in the evening, it possessed some heat, and tasted a bit “cooked”. What might once have been nice fresh plums, was both smelling and tasting a bit like cooked plums & other jammy fruit.

All in all a wonderful evening with a new friend and possible business partner, but somewhat disappointing wines.

TONIGHT I will be tasting Châteauneuf-du-Pape with my tasting group. Very much looking forward & I hope to post a full tasting report at my earliest convenience…

Happy drinking!

WTG.