Going GREEN with your wine drinking

January 11th, 2008

I arrived in Israel a little more than 36 hours ago and I’ve already begun to run around the country to meet with my wonderful friends in the wine business out here. I’ll be heading into the Judean Hills region today but I wanted to put together a real quick post before leaving.

A recently really an interesting piece written by Dr Vino (drvino.com) AKA Tyler Colman that I found in the NYT published on Dec 30, 2007 called Red, White or Green?

In the article Colman discusses the “carbon footprint” of a bottle of wine or as he explains it the “amount of carbon dioxide (that) is emitted in its production and transportation”. While I will not get into the politics or personal preference for saving the environment, I do want to quote some interesting facts Colman points out.

  • A Napa Valley wine can emit 2.6 pounds of carbon dioxide on its journey from growing the grapes, making the wine and transport to San Francisco
  • The same bottle making the truck trip to Connecticut (or elsewhere on the east coast, say New York City) would emit 5.7 pounds of carbon dioxide in total.
  • Holding the growing method, winery practices and bottle size constant, it is more carbon-efficient for people in Connecticut to drink a bottle of wine from Bordeaux than from Sonoma. The short truck route on both ends of the efficient miles of container shipping means the French wine has 50 percent less carbon dioxide emissions, about three pounds.

Now, the French and many of their European counterparts are selling us wine at exorbitant prices already, and the weakening dollar is making those already expensive bottles even MORE expensive.

SO, we should not be buying wine from California because of carbon emissions, we can’t afford to be buying French and other European wines (let along wait for them to be mature, or ready to be drunk), so where does that leave us???

GOOD QUESTION! I think this is where the concept of drinking wines from lesser known winemaking regions comes into play. And I bet you know where I’m going now….yup, DRINK ISRAELI WINE!!!! Most israeli wines are made in a New World Style so you don’t have to lay them down and wait 10+ years to soften and be ready to drink. And Israeli wines are more carbon friendly than our own domestic Napa wines – at least for those of us residing on the East Coast.

Remember, drink Israeli wine!!!

Have a fabulous weekend.

WTG.

Laurie Daniel: What’s ahead for wine drinkers in 2008

January 8th, 2008

A recent article, “What’s ahead for wine drinkers in 2008”, written by Laurie Daniel for the San jose Mercury News is an interesting read, with 4 predictions listed below.  Not much for me to add but I do want to comment on #3.

1.  Domestic wines should look more attractive as prices rise on many imports.

2. More companies will start touting how “green” their wines are.

3. We’ll see more wines from ever-more obscure places.

4. Some wine producers will become more transparent about their winemaking practices.

 

 

When referring to the “obscure places” in #3 Daniels mentions places in Countries like Italy & Spain that once was not considered to be a wine producing region and now is.  She proceeds to mention countries such as Croatia, Bulgaria, the former Soviet republic of Georgia and even goes so far as to contemplate the possibility of wines from China.

 

I am interested in this prediction (isn’t it really an already proven trend?) as it relates to another “obscure” region…yup, ISRAEL!  While Israel can not even be mentioned in the same breath in terms of size, I think the recent Wine Advocate feature on Israeli wines both confirms Daniels suspicion that new, previously unexpected wine regions will emerge in the not too distant future AND that Israel should be included in the list of “obscure places”.

 

Keep your eyes open…premium Israeli wine MAY be coming to a shelf near you sooner than you think…

 

Happy happy everybody…

WTG.

Italian Wine tasting (Sicily) & Pizza

January 7th, 2008

I just got back from a fabulous impromptu Italian wine & pizza tasting with several of my wine tasting group members (and some guests/possible new members??).

There were only 7 of us there, and 5 of the 7 can be considered “industry” people (the other two are “public defenders”). The fact that there were so many industry people should not intimidate anyone as we all CLAIM to know a thing or two about wine, but in reality we are just a bunch of open-mined AND opinionated (is that possible?) wine lovers who have sacrificed a good livelihood for one we infatuate over.

There are so many things I can write about. The heated argument about whether JOE consumer cares about HOW his wine is made. Which is better, New World wines or OLD WORLD wines. How to interact with those who know less about wine. The evening prompted so many interesting topics yet I must admit…I am too BUZZED to get deep right now. So I’m simply going to blog (briefly) about “TECHNOLOGY”.

We talked about the improvements wines from all over the world have made in recent years.  Someone commented how they wonder if wines from the same winery in a recent vintage & one from a vintage many years ago were made (and tasted) the same (or at least comparably). At which point the phenomena of technology & perceived “better quality” came up. We wondered if improved technology has in fact improved quality or has led many AUTHENTIC & genuinely hand made wines to have now become more generic – also unaffectionately known as “laboratory wines”.

Overall, I liked 3 of the 7 wines we had. I felt the other 4 were overly extracted and lacked balance. They were too jammy (or as our gracious host put it possessed – “stewed plums”) & did not have the acidic & tannic backbone to hold up to the sweet/extracted/jammy flavors. The 3 I liked were not the types of wine I typically go for. They were not Bordeaux style wines. No Cabernet Sauvignion. No Merlot. No Cab Franc, Petit Verdot or even any Syrah (shiraz). Lots of varietals I am not all that familiar with. But the ones I liked had interesting yet subtle fruit, nice minerality, a hint of spice or floral to the nose. But most important was a backbone that sufficiently supported the flavors.

I’m off to Israel this week to meet with my fabulous boutique wine producing contacts and help to bring back NY/US worthy wines.  Barring unforeseen wine drinking within the next 48 hours my next report comes from the holy land AKA the next “up-and-coming wine haven”…

Until then, happy wine tasting…

WTG.

Wine Tasting Groups

January 3rd, 2008

I just read a great article on wine tasting groups. Upon my return from Napa in February of ’06 I joined one such group in NYC that I am thrilled to be able to say I am still a vibrant member of. At our group’s core is a non-conformist, part-time wine clerk, & budding writer, whom together with his attorney finance have graciously hosted several of our bi-monthly events. While there a few wine industry people (all relatively new to the industry) in the group, mainly it is a warm, wine-loving, eclectic group of doctors, lawyers, researchers, professionals of all types, & aspiring wine aficionados who enjoy wine & one another’s company. Twice a month may be a lot for some, but for those seeking a way to learn about wine, or even simply a new social outlet, it is a great time. I am also happy to report that following many of these intimate drinking escapades I now feel a special bond with most of the “regulars”.

While living in the city and fully utilizing public transportation affords me the luxury of not adhering to Mr. Gregutt’s “Dump Bucket” mandate, without further ado, here is the article, written by Paul Greggutt (found online at the Seattle Times website)

January 2, 2008 – Resolved for 2008: Start a wine-tasting group

Special to the Seattle Times

Let’s start the new year right, with a resolution to be proactive about wine-tasting in 2008.

Let’s face it, most wine encounters are random. You grab a bottle while shopping for dinner, or you pick something off a restaurant list because the sommelier recommends it. Maybe you are visiting friends and they pull something out of the cellar for you to try.

There is nothing wrong with any of that. But if you want to make 2008 the year that you really make some headway understanding wine, you should resolve right now to start a tasting group.

There’s a big difference between drinking wine and tasting wine in a (more or less) formal group setting. Drinking is for fun, for dinner parties, for nights on the town, with wine in a supporting role. Tasting is a different sort of social occasion, where wine is the star of the show, and attention is focused upon each bottle.

I am fortunate to be a member in two, long-running tasting groups. Both meet monthly, and taste the wines blind (meaning the bottles are concealed). Here’s how it works: A topic is chosen some time in advance — generally a specific type of wine from a specific region — and that becomes the focus for the tasting.

In one group, a volunteer gathers the wines. The total cost is then divided among the 12 members. This system works well in several ways. First, it guarantees that a diverse representation of appropriate wines will be poured. Second, it ensures that only one person in the group knows what any of the wines are. However, this system only works if everyone shows up and divides the cost fairly.

If you want a more ad hoc approach, have the host assign the topic and let each tasting-group member bring a bottle. That way, if a few last-minute cancellations occur, no one is on the hook for the money.

A tasting group of 8 to 12 people is just the right number; big enough for a lively discussion, but small enough to allow for generous pours. In one of my groups, each person sets out a dozen glasses and the wines are all poured at once, from numbered brown paper bags. This offers the advantage of allowing the most direct comparisons among the entire group, because there is no specific tasting sequence required, and all wines are present at all times.

In my other group, each person has just one glass, and the wines are tasted one at a time. We keep the pours small (1 ounce per person) so each bottle can go around twice. This also works well; the first time through, the tasters can get a good conversation going with a lot of guessing about such topics as the producer, the vintage and so on.

The second time around the wine has had time to breathe, and impressions are likely to change. You’ll see that most wines are moving targets. Flavors expand, contract, harden, soften or morph into something entirely unforeseen when the bottle is first opened. Wines that at first seemed delicious sometimes quickly fall apart; wines that may have been hard and tight open up and reveal layers of flavor that were missed the first time through.

Why taste blind? The simple answer is you learn more. It adds to the excitement and fuels the conversation. And when tasting blind, it is the prerogative of the host to provide a ringer — one wine (hidden among the rest) that is not from the assigned topic.

If, for example, your topic is Washington syrah, then the ringer might be a syrah from Paso Robles. Part of the fun is trying to spot the ringer.

You may not be quite ready to sign on to a monthly commitment, but winter is a good time to host a preview wine-tasting event, to see who among your friends might be interested in joining a regular group. The setup is simple. Have a clean wine glass for each person, along with dump buckets, a notepad and pen, and some light snacks.

Once the wines are gathered, someone will need to pull the corks, wrap each bottle in a plain brown bag, seal it with a rubber band, and number it. Hide the corks so no one can cheat! This is a blind tasting, remember.

Now about those dump buckets. “We’re not going to spit good wine!” your friends may complain. Oh yes they will. That’s the serious part of a formal tasting. How else can you sample a dozen wines responsibly? As host, you will have to enforce that rule. For what it’s worth, in my two groups, which are mostly composed of winemakers, wine distributors and wine retailers, everyone spits everything all the time. That is how it is done in the trade.

At the end of the night, have the members vote for their favorite — preferably before the bags are pulled and the wines’ identities revealed. In any group of a dozen wines you’ll discover a couple of gems that you’ll want to purchase. There are usually a couple of disappointments — pricey and/or prestigious wines that simply didn’t rise to the occasion. But for the price of a single bottle, you’ve tasted up to a dozen, and found the one(s) you like the best. Happy tasting!

Paul Gregutt is the author of “Washington Wines and Wineries The Essential Guide.”

 

Wine making: technical aspects – Do You Care?

January 2nd, 2008

There are several thing that led to my career shift into the wine industry. But the bottom line is I really love EVERYTHING about it. The vineyards, the harvests, the hard work, the winemaking, the aging, all the technical aspects, etc…

BUT, that is me. I have been told by friends that if/when they hear someone ask me a wine related question they run for the hills. Because wine (and wine making) is SO INVOLVED I tend to stumble into long winded responses that can put people to sleep.

That said, I was recently asked by a friend at an Israeli winery to help them out with an English version of their “technical spec sheet” – something they have been told by their importer is very important in the marketing of their wines. While I was thrilled to help out, I wondered, DOES THE AVERAGE WINE CONSUMER REALLY CARE ABOUT STUFF LIKE “ph”, “TA”, BRIX AT HARVEST, etc…?????????

More on this topic in future blog posts, but I welcome any thoughts…

Happy ’08!

WTG.

Happy New Year!

December 31st, 2007

Not much to say today, but I don’t want too many days to go by between posts so just a quickie tonight.

Let me start by apologizing for my last post (ie. rant). I apparently overreacted to a post elsewhere regarding wines which had seemingly “changed” between a critic’s first and second tasting. I gather this is not the most common phenomena, but it is possibly a byproduct of young wine producers heeding a critics critique & intentionally altering their product. I do stand by my strong feelings on the matter & further DO NOT believe that ANYONE, consumer & producer alike, should allow a critic too much influence. But I suppose that sales is the bottom line and if the critic knows what people like and can help the producers to understand what that is, then maybe it is not such a terrible thing…most of us after all do need to earn a living.

Tomorrow night is New Years. Will you be drinking bubbly?

I recently picked up a couple of bottles of Yarden blanc de blancs 2000. A very well regarded vintage sparkling wine. So well regarded that it unexpectedly appeared on a list of random sparkling wines on justwinepoints.com and was given a very respectable 92 points, while The Wall Street Journal called it a wonderful international sparkling wine. I know, I know, I just got through chastising those who let points/critics dictate their wine enjoyment, but nobody is perfect , right?!?

Happy New Year!!! Hope it is a year filled with enjoying wines that YOU LIKE…regardless of what others say about said wine.

WTG.

Wine critics – what good are they?

December 28th, 2007

This is a scary topic for a post. It is pretty much a catch-22. If I love critics I am a suck-up & a “score-whore”. If I hate them then I am a non-conformist joining the ranks of those who say down with “The Man”. And anywhere in between and I am an indecisive, politically correct, good for nothing.

Real generally…

Wine critics are GREAT. They help us weave our way through a daunting maze of products and help us to determine which of these products are worth our time.

Wine critics are BAD. They know nothing about us yet tell us what we should like, should not like, what brands we should value & patron, and whose wines we should not dare touch with a 10 foot pole.

I’m writing about critics today as a topic came up on a message board I frequent. Interestingly enough, not too many people on the board (at least initially) seemed to pick up on this “issue”. The board is moderated by Daniel Rogov, Israel’s preeminent wine critic. Rogov began a post about several wines he reviewed by stating the following…

Although many of the wines I re-tasted during this two day voyage (17 and 18 December) showed a high level of consistency between this and earlier tastings, some showed so dramatically different and almost invariably better that one cannot help but wonder in a few cases at least precisely what happened between tastings. Among the possibilities – wines coming into their own, wines that have been somehow “doctored”, separate bottlings from different batches or even different grapes.

This last statement was what i found most disconcerting. Do wine critics and the scores they give have such an influence in todays society that wineries will resort to misrepresenting themselves so as to gain a better review or higher score – assuming this will result in their selling more wine or gaining a better reputation??? Don’t the consumers who ultimately buy said wine know enough that if the “REAL” product is crap they will know it and NOT buy it. To take things a step further, the consumer and their ultimate realization that the wine does not live up to its review might even resent the misrepresentation and speak BADLY about the wine.

And what about the critic? Given the apparent POWER that critics have in determining a winery’s ultimate success or failure has led many a critic to be reviled and loathed by wineries whose products did not receive positive reviews. Does the associated jealousy & hatred justify providing the critic with samples which do not properly represent the product the critic thinks he/she is reviewing??? Should the winery not consider their disappointment & think of the credibility the critic will lose???

We are living in an age where the PURE has become UN-pure. Athletes in America’s “past time” (baseball) take steroids or other artificial enhancers so that they can hit more home runs or pitch the ball faster. CEO’s & politicians lie, cheat & steal so that they can accumulate greater wealth & power.

I LOVE WINE. Its purity. Its simplicity. Its diversity. Its inebriating effects 🙂

MUST wine be another means for people to lie, cheat & steal to accumulate more fame, fortune & wealth? Saddens me…but I suppose that is life. Wake up and smell the casis, mocha & licorice Wine Tasting Guy… WINE is a business like any other. Play by its rules or be stuck drinking that Australian Wine with the critter label or that Californian wine with the nickname that starts with a “two” and whose second & third words rhyme with Fu… I mean “truck’.

OK, it ain’t that bad. But drama sells. I promise to revisit the whole critic issue in future posts. But for now, next time you pick up a bottle of wine at a shop and consider purchasing it because some critic said it is a 92 and is elegant, with silky something & velvety something else – think twice… and consider trying it for yourself before making the investment.

Happy wine drinking!!!!

WTG.

Drinking Wine Linked to Lower Risk of Lung Cancer

December 27th, 2007

Just got the news from good ole’ Wine Spectator.  (http://www.winespectator.com/Wine/Features/0,1197,4171,00.html)

Of note however is that beer & spirits led to elevated risk.  “Drinking wine is associated with a lower risk of developing lung cancer, according to a meta-analysis published in the November issue of Cancer Epidemiological Markers & Prevention. Those who consume more than one serving of beer or spirits in any amount, however, were found to have an elevated risk.”

Yeah, I know, “THEY come out with a new study every day”…but hey, we believe what we want to believe anyway right?

So drink away friends – it is good for you (in moderation of course)!!!!

Happy Almost New Year!!

WTG.

Beer drinking dogs

December 24th, 2007

Yes, this is supposed to be a WINE related blog. But this story was too funny not to blog.

Now giving pets of any type alcohol is NOT funny (ok, maybe it is but I certainly do not condone it), but this “RESEARCH STUDY” left me with images of drunk dogs stumbling around a lab. Here is the piece…

GUINNESS IS GOOD FOR YOU

Remember that old advertising slogan “Guinness is Good for You” on signs? New research supports that claim. A pint of Guinness a day may work as well as an aspirin to prevent heart clots that raise the risk of heart attacks. Drinking regular lager does not yield the same benefits, experts from University of Wisconsin told a conference yesterday, although alcohol of any type does help reduce clots.

 

The Wisconsin team tested the health-giving properties of stout against lager by giving it to dogs who had narrowed arteries similar to those in heart disease. They found that those given the Guinness had reduced clotting activity in their blood, but not those given lager.

 

The researchers told a meeting of the American Heart Association in Orlando, Florida, that the most benefit they saw was from 24 fluid ounces of Guinness taken at mealtimes. They believe that “antioxidant compounds” in the Guinness, similar to those found in certain fruits and vegetables, are responsible for the health benefits because they slow down the deposit of harmful cholesterol on the artery walls.

 

 

 

You know the famous painting of the dogs playing poker?  Now take those same dogs sitting around a table and picture them each with a pint of Guinness.

 

BRILLIANT!!!

 

Happy Holidays everyone…

WTG

Wine Ingredients (part 2)

December 24th, 2007

I blogged this when Bonny Doon first released the news that they would be including ingredients on their labels.  They have just released more specific information, and have indicated that they will be including 2 types of ingredient notifications.   The first are for those ingredients that remain in the wine, and the second, for those that are used in the winemaking process but are then REMOVED from said wine.

Randall Grahm Discloses All on New Labels

SANTA CRUZ, Calif.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Bonny Doon Vineyard labels will disclose all wine ingredients beginning with the 2007 vintage white and 2006 vintage red wines. As of 2008, consumers will note that all ingredients are listed in two sections on the back label of each bottle of Bonny Doon wine. The first section highlights the wines basic ingredients, i.e. grapes and sulfur dioxide, a preservative, found in the wine. The second section will point out ingredients used in the production of the wine such as bentonite, (a type of clay used to clarify wine prior to bottling) that essentially no longer remain in the wine.I’m writing about this as I really find it to be a real breakthrough for the wine industry (specifically as someone who prefers to know what it is that I am eating/drinking).  I wonder how others who restrict certain ingredients from their diet feel about ingredients used strictly for clarifying wine – meaning the ingredients are added and then removed.  If you were trying to avoid said ingredients and were told it was added and then removed, how would you feel about it???

I welcome comments and at some point if I ever get an “email me” button up, I welcome direct contact as well.

Happy holidays.  Drink wine, but DO IT safely!!!!

WTG